NACPEC: North American Consumer Project on Electronic Commerce

Jurisdiction

Alphabetized by author's last name, then title

ABA/ICC Survey Global Internet Jurisdiction. Survey elaborated by the American Bar Association’s Business Law Section, Cyberspace Law, in conjunction with the International Chamber of Commerce and the Internet Law and Policy Forum and conducted by professor Michael Geist, as Sub-Committee Chair of the Internet Jurisdiction Sub-Committee. 277 companies in 44 countries participated in this survey, which examines the practical effects and risks of Internet jurisdiction worldwide, (April, 2004)

Bhallo, Shafik, “Jurisdictional Issues in Electronic Commerce Contracts: A Canadian Perspective,” Computer Law Review and Technology Journal, Vol. VIII., April 2004.

Consumer Measures Committee (CMC), Office of Consumer Affairs, Industry Canada “The Determination of Jurisdiction in Cross-border Business-to-Consumer Transactions: Consultation Paper”, (2002)

Corn-Revere Robert, “Caught in the Seamless Web: Does the Internet’s Global Reach Justify Less Freedom of Speech?”, CATO Institute, Briefing Paper No. 70, (July 24, 2002)

Garnett, Richard, “Down Jones & Company Inc. v. Gutnick: An Adequate Response to Transnational Internet Defamation,” Melbourne Journal of International Law, Vol 4., p.196, 2003

Geist, Michael “Is There a There There? Towards Greater Certainty for Internet Jurisdiction”, University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law, (April 2001)

Greenstein, Richard, Michael “The Action Bias in American Law: Internet Jurisdiction and the Triumph of Zippo Dot Com”, Temple University Beasley School of Law, 2006

International Chamber of Commerce, “Jurisdiction and Applicable Law in Electronic Commerce”, document drafted by the Electronic Commerce Project (ECP) Ad hoc Task Force, (June 6, 2001)

Johnson R. David and David G. Post, “Law And Borders- The Rise of Law in Cyberspace” (48 Stanford Law Review 1367), (1996)

Judge Dickerson Thomas A., “Consumer Law: The Internet and its Impact Upon Personal Jurisdiction”. Submitted For Publication To The Journal Of The Torts, Insurance And Compensation Law Section Of The New York State Bar Association, (March 21, 2000)

Leigh Gay, Tricia, “Minimum Contacts in Cyberspace: The Classic Jurisdiction Analysis in a New Setting,” Journal of High Technology Law, Vol. 1 No. 1, 2002.

Lemley, Mark, “Place and Cyberspace” UC Berkeley School of Law, Public Law and Legal Theory, Research Paper No. 102, (2002)

McWhinney Christopher, Sean Wooden, Jeremy McKown, John Ryan, and Joseph Green, “The ‘Sliding Scale’ of Personal Jurisdiction Via the Internet”, Stanford Technology Law Review, (1999)

Nauss Exon, Susan, “Personal Jurisdiction: Lost in Cyberspace?,” Computer Law Review and Technology Journal, Vol. VIII. No. 1, Fall 2003

“No Bad Puns: A Different Approach to the Problem of Personal Jurisdiction and the Internet”, Harvard Law Review, Volume 116 , Issue 6, (2003)

Oberding M. Juliete & Terje Norderhaug, “A Separate Jurisdiction for Cyberspace”, No year of publication.

Ogilvy Renault, “Jurisdiction and the Internet, Are Traditional Rules Enough?” (July 1998)

Personal Jurisdiction in Cyberspace. A website specially designed by former students Chris Kindel and Deidra Grant for the Cyberspace Law Seminar of the University of North Carolina School of Law. This site was created to explore the issue overarching lawsuits based on Internet related activities- personal jurisdiction and contains abstract of cases and sections with general recommendations, e-contracts and other references on personal and Internet jurisdiction.

Perritt Jr., H. Henry, “Computer Crimes and Torts in the Global Information Infrastructure: Intermediaries and Jurisdiction”, University of Oslo, (12 October 1995)

Reidenberg, Joel R. “Technology and Internet Jurisdiction” University of Pennsylvania, Vol. 153, (2005)

Reidenberg, Joel R. “The Yahoo Case and the International Democratization of the Internet” (April 2001). Fordham Law & Economics Research Paper No. 11

Rolph, David, “The Message Not the Medium: Defamation, Publication and the Internet in Down Jones & Co Inc. v. Gutnick,” Sydney Law Review, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2002

Saadat, Michael, “Jurisdiction and the Internet after Gutnick and Yahoo”, The Journal of Information Law and Technology (JILT), (22 August 2005)

Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke LLP, “Case Finding Jurisdiction on the Basis of Internet Contracts”

Schiff Berman, Paul, “The Globalization of Jurisdiction”, University of Connecticut School of Law Working Paper Series, Working Paper 13, (October 1 2002)

Spang-Hannssen, Henrik, “Cyberspace Jurisdiction in the US (From an Alien’s Point of View)- The International Dimension of Due Process,” COMPLEX SERIES, No. 5/01, Institutt for rettsinfomatikk - Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law, 2001

Tassé Roger & Maxime Faille, “Online Consumer Protection, A Study of Regulatory Jurisdiction in Canada”. Prepared for the Office of Consumer Affairs of Industry Canada, (July, 2001)

Timofeeva, Yulia A. “Worldwide Prescriptive Jurisdiction in Internet Content Controversies: Comparative Analysis”, Connecticut Journal of International Law, Vol. 20, Fall 2004. University of Erfurt - Max Weber Center. (local copy)

Uniform Law Conference of Canada, Civil Law Section, “Jurisdiction and Consumer Protection in Electronic Commerce Project”, Report of the Working Group, (August 2003)

Vartanian, P. Thomas, “A Global Approach To The Laws of Jurisdiction in Cyberspace”, (September 2002)

Velasco San Martin, Cristos, “Jurisdictional Aspects of Cloud Computing” Octopus Interface Conference, Cooperation against Cybercrime 2009, February 28, 2009

Velasco, Cristos, “A propósito de la jurisdicción y el derecho aplicable en Internet” Entérate en Línea, Dirección General de Servicios de Cómputo Académico de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) (November 2005)

Wilske Stephan & Teresa Schiller, “International Jurisdiction in Cyberspace: Which States May Regulate the Internet?” 50 Federal Communications Law Journal 119 (1997)